Artikel Alle Rechte vorbehalten
referiert
Veröffentlicht

Agrochemical spray drift; assessment and mitigation: A review

Zugehörigkeit
Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Richland, WA, USA
Felsot, Allan S.;
Zugehörigkeit
Independent Consultant, Chelmsford, UK
Unsworth, John B.;
Zugehörigkeit
National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Linders, Jan B. H. J.;
Zugehörigkeit
Graham S. Roberts, Dept. of Primary Industries, Victoria, Australia
Roberts, Graham;
GND
1058939009
Zugehörigkeit
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Institute for Application Techniques in Plant Protection, Germany
Rautmann, Dirk;
Zugehörigkeit
Exponent International Ltd., The Lenz, Harrogate, UK
Harris, Caroline;
Zugehörigkeit
Centro de Investigaci´on en Contaminaci´on Ambiental, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jos´e, Costa Rica
Carazo, Elizabeth

During application of agrochemicals spray droplets can drift beyond the intended target to non-target receptors, including water, plants and animals. Factors affecting this spray drift include mode of application, droplet size, which can be modified by the nozzle types, formulation adjuvants, wind direction, wind speed, air stability, relative humidity, temperature and height of released spray relative to the crop canopy. The rate of fall of spray droplets depends upon the size of the droplets but is modified by entrainment in a mobile air mass and is also influenced by the rate of evaporation of the liquid constituting the aerosol. The longer the aerosol remains in the air before falling to the ground (or alternatively striking an object above ground) the greater the opportunity for it to be carried away from its intended target. In general, all size classes of droplets are capable of movement off target, but the smallest are likely to move the farthest before depositing on the ground or a non-target receptor. It is not possible to avoid spray drift completely but it can be minimized by using best-management practices. These include using appropriate nozzle types, shields, spray pressure, volumes per area sprayed, tractor speed and only spraying when climatic conditions are suitable. Field layout can also influence spray drift, whilst crop-free and spray-free buffer zones and windbreak crops can also have a mitigating effect. Various models are available to estimate the environmental exposure from spray drift at the time of application.

Dateien

Zitieren

Zitierform:
Zitierform konnte nicht geladen werden.

Zugriffsstatistik

Gesamt:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:
12 Monate:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:

Rechte

Nutzung und Vervielfältigung:
Alle Rechte vorbehalten