Article All rights reserved
refereed
published

Coexistence in Maize: Effect on Pollen-Mediated Gene Flow by Conventional Maize Border Rows Edging Genetically Modified Maize Fields

GND
1058990772
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Brunswick, Germany
Rühl, Gerhard;
GND
1058920871
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Strategies and Technology Assessment, Kleinmachnow, Germany
Hommel, Bernd;
GND
129526568
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology, Quedlinburg, Germany
Hüsken, Alexandra; Mastel, Klaus;
GND
141232439
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology, Quedlinburg, Germany
Schiemann, Joachim;
GND
1059146940
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Breeding Research on Agricultural Crops, Sanitz, Germany
Wehling, Peter;
GND
130200638
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Brunswick, Germany
Langhof, Maren

In addition to or as substitution for a regulated isolation distance, conventional maize (Zea mays L.) border rows at the genetically modified (GM) maize field edge are considered as feasible measure to ensure coexistence between GM and conventional or organic maize. Therefore, we examined the effectiveness of 9-m- and 18-m-wide non-GM maize borders at the GM maize field edge on outcrossing rates into a neighboring non-GM maize field. One field experiment each was conducted in 2008 at three sites in Germany using a field orientation representing a worst-case scenario concerning wind direction. In each case, the distance between GM and non-GM maize fields was 51 m. At two sites, sizes of GM and non-GM maize fields were 0.8 ha, respectively, and at the third site 0.5 ha (GM) and 0.3 ha (non-GM). The GM percentages of individual samples taken at recipient field depths between 0 and 90 m were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Overall, no pollen-mediated gene flow reducing effect of border rows was observed in the present study, although synchrony of anthesis between GM maize and border row maize was given at each site. Calculated GM contents of the total non-GM fields harvest were always below the European Union labeling threshold of 0.9%. In consequence, planting 9-m- or 18-m-wide conventional maize border rows at the GM field edge is no reliable coexistence measure, at least if combined with an isolation distance.

Files

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Rights

Use and reproduction:
All rights reserved

Export