The global climate change mitigation strategy Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradationenREDD :monitoring costs and uncertainties jeopardize economic benefits
REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) has been suggested as a climate change mitigation strategy that is based on the philosophy to reward countries for reducing their deforestation and forest degradation by financial benefits via the generation of carbon credits. While the potential of REDD has been widely discussed, minor attention has been drawn to the implication of uncertainties and costs associated with the estimation of carbon stock changes. To raise awareness of these issues, we conducted a simulation study for a set of countries that show high to low deforestation rates, which demonstrates that the potential to generate benefits from REDD depends highly on the magnitude of the total error while assessment costs and the price of carbon credits play a minor role. For countries with low deforestation rates REDD is obviously not an option for generating benefits as they would need to implement monitoring systems that are able to estimate carbon stock changes with a total error well below 1 %. Total errors feasible under operational monitoring systems are only sufficient to gain revenues from REDD regimes under high deforestation rates
Plugge, Daniel / Baldauf, Thomas / Köhl, Michael: The global climate change mitigation strategy REDD :monitoring costs and uncertainties jeopardize economic benefits. 2012.
Use and reproduction:
All rights reserved