Article CC BY 4.0
refereed
published

NanoDefiner Framework and e-Tool Revisited According to the European Commission’s Nanomaterial Definition 2022/C 229/01

Affiliation
Department of Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund (FH Dortmund), Dortmund, Germany
Brüngel, Raphael;
Affiliation
Department of Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund (FH Dortmund), Dortmund, Germany
Rückert, Johannes;
Affiliation
Analytical and Material Science, BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany
Müller, Philipp;
Affiliation
Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Dresden (TU Dresden), Dresden, Germany
Babick, Frank;
Affiliation
Department of Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund (FH Dortmund), Dortmund, Germany
Friedrich, Christoph M.;
Affiliation
RI Centre Brussels, Solvay S.A., Brussels, Belgium
Ghanem, Antoine;
Affiliation
Division 6.1 Surface Analysis and Interfacial Chemistry, Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Berlin, Germany
Hodoroaba, Vasile-Dan;
Affiliation
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
Mech, Agnieszka;
Affiliation
Department Safety in the Food Chain, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
Weigel, Stefan;
Affiliation
Analytical and Material Science, BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany
Wohlleben, Wendel;
Affiliation
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
Rauscher, Hubert

The new recommended definition of a nanomaterial, 2022/C 229/01, adopted by the European Commission in 2022, will have a considerable impact on European Union legislation addressing chemicals, and therefore tools to implement this new definition are urgently needed. The updated NanoDefiner framework and its etool implementation presented here are such instruments, which help stakeholders to find out in a straightforward way whether a material is a nanomaterial or not. They are two major outcomes of the NanoDefine project, which is explicitly referred to in the new definition. This work revisits the framework and etool, and elaborates necessary adjustments to make these outcomes applicable for the updated recommendation. A broad set of case studies on representative materials confirms the validity of these adjustments. To further foster the sustainability and applicability of the framework and etool, measures for the FAIRification of expert knowledge within the etool’s knowledge base are elaborated as well. The updated framework and etool are now ready to be used in line with the updated recommendation. The presented approach may serve as an example for reviewing existing guidance and tools developed for the previous definition 2011/696/EU, particularly those adopting NanoDefine project outcomes.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Rights

Use and reproduction: