Article CC BY 4.0
refereed
published

Targeting yield and reducing nitrous oxide emission by use of single and double inhibitor treated urea during winter wheat season in Northern Germany

Affiliation
Tea Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, South Meiling Road 9, Hangzhou, China
Ni, Kang;
Affiliation
Department of Agronomy and Crop Science, Kiel University, Hermann Rodewald Str. 9, Kiel, Germany
Vietinghoff, Moritz;
GND
1018860924
ORCID
0000-0003-1615-5122
Affiliation
Department of Agronomy and Crop Science, Kiel University, Hermann Rodewald Str. 9, Kiel, Germany
Pacholski, Andreas

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a powerful greenhouse gas and has an adverse effect on stratospheric ozone. Field application of synthetic N fertilizers is the largest source of global N2O emission and different N forms (nitrate vs. ammoniacal N) may play a significant role. In addition, the use of nitrification inhibitor (NI) is considered as a reliable way to mitigate agricultural N2O emission, whereas this effect is still debated for urease inhibitors (UI). However, the efficacy of NI or UI is still variable among different inhibitor products and environmental conditions. This study was conducted to test the efficacy of N form (calcium ammonium nitrate CAN vs. urea) and the almost unstudied UI, N-(2-nitrophenyl) phosphoric triamide (2-NPT), as well as an NI, mixture of dicyandiamide and 1H-1,2,4-triazol (DCD/TZ) and the combination of both inhibitors on N2O emission and crop yield. The measurements were carried out in winter wheat growth season in the subsequent years of 2012–2013 in the North of Germany. No difference in cumulated N2O emissions were observed between urea and CAN. The results confirmed the positive effect of NI (DCD/TZ) on reducing N2O emission. Compared with untreated urea, NI addition caused ∼75 % reduction of fertilizer derived N2O emissions within the vegetation period. The combination of UI and NI did not result in a further reduction of relative or yield-scaled N2O emission, although it resulted in higher grain yield and nitrogen recovery. Addition of UI showed no consistent effect on N2O emission compared to untreated urea, however in year 2013 a significant reduction of fertilizer derived emissions by ∼50 % was observed. Higher yields were observed for CAN fertilization compared to urea, though not significant. For both treatments including UI the yield effects, in particular N use efficiency, were stronger than for untreated urea and urea solely treated with NI. Therefore, the combined treatment with UI and NI was the most advantageous fertilizer solution for concomitantly achieving high yield, high nitrogen utilization efficiency and N2O emission reduction.

Preview

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Rights

Use and reproduction: