Article CC BY 4.0
refereed
published

The utility of the ‘Arable Weeds and Management in Europe’ database: Challenges and opportunities of combining weed survey data at a European scale

Affiliation
1Net Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK
Metcalfe, Helen;
Affiliation
University of Rostock, Crop Health, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Germany
Bürger, Jana;
GND
1193271819
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Institute of Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland, Germany
von Redwitz, Christoph;
Affiliation
Sistemas Agrícolas, Forestales y Medio Ambiente, Plant Protection, Agrifood Research and Technology Centre of Aragon (CITA), Zaragoza, Spain
Cirujeda, Alicia;
Affiliation
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Torino, Italy
Fogliatto, Silvia;
Affiliation
Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute – National Research Institute, National Centre for Plant Genetic Resources, Błonie, Poland ; Cultivar Testing, Nursery and Genebank Resources Department, National Institute for Horticultural Research, Skierniewice, Poland
Dostatny, Denise F.;
Affiliation
University of Rostock, Crop Health, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Germany
Gerowitt, Bärbel;
Affiliation
Provision of Biodiversity in Agrarian Systems, Research Area II: “Land Use and Governance”, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Müncheberg, Müncheberg, Germany
Glemnitz, Michael;
Affiliation
Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Cordoba, Spain
González‐Andújar, José L.;
Affiliation
Department of Plant Protection, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology, Spanish National Research Council (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain
Hernández Plaza, Eva;
Affiliation
Department of Agrifood Engineering and Biotechnology, Politechnical University of Catalunya, Castelldefels, Spain
Izquierdo, Jordi;
Affiliation
Department of Agroecology and Crop Production, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha – Suchdol, Czech Republic
Kolářová, Michaela;
Affiliation
Institute for Plant Protection Research ‘Agrihorts’, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, Latvia
Ņečajeva, Jevgenija;
Affiliation
Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRAE, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon Cedex, France
Petit, Sandrine;
Affiliation
Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Mosonmagyarovár, Hungary
Pinke, Gyula;
Affiliation
Department of Weed Science, Institute of Phytomedicine, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Schumacher, Matthias;
GND
144040743
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Institute of Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland, Germany
Ulber, Lena;
Affiliation
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Torino, Italy
Vidotto, Francesco;
Affiliation
Plant Health Laboratory, Anses, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France
Fried, Guillaume

Over the last 30 years, many studies have surveyed weed vegetation on arable land. The ‘Arable Weeds and Management in Europe’ (AWME) database is a collection of 36 of these surveys and the associated management data. Here, we review the challenges associated with combining disparate datasets and explore some of the opportunities for future research that present themselves thanks to the AWME database. We present three case studies repeating previously published national scale analyses with data from a larger spatial extent. The case studies, originally done in France, Germany and the UK, explore various aspects of weed ecology (community composition, management and environmental effects and within-field distributions) and use a range of statistical techniques (canonical correspondence analysis, redundancy analysis and generalised linear mixed models) to demonstrate the utility and versatility of the AWME database. We demonstrate that (i) the standardisation of abundance data to a common measure, before the analysis of the combined dataset, has little impact on the outcome of the analyses, (ii) the increased extent of environmental or management gradients allows for greater confidence in conclusions and (iii) the main conclusions of analyses done at different spatial scales remain consistent. These case studies demonstrate the utility of a Europe-wide weed survey database, for clarifying or extending results obtained from studies at smaller scales. This Europe-wide data collection offers many more opportunities for analysis that could not be addressed in smaller datasets; including questions about the effects of climate change, macro-ecological and biogeographical issues related to weed diversity as well as the dominance or rarity of specific weeds in Europe.

Preview

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Rights

License Holder: 2022 The Authors.

Use and reproduction: