Article CC BY 4.0
refereed
published

Chronic High Glyphosate Exposure Delays Individual Worker Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Development under Field Conditions

GND
140652434
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Institute for Bee Protection, Germany
Odemer, Richard;
GND
1053660189
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Institute for Bee Protection, Germany
Alkassab, Abdulrahim T.;
GND
1058918826
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Institute for Bee Protection, Germany
Bischoff, Gabriela;
GND
113986193X
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Institute for Bee Protection, Germany
Frommberger, Malte;
GND
1172321477
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Institute for Bee Protection, Germany
Wernecke, Anna;
GND
1058931229
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Institute for Bee Protection, Germany
Wirtz, Ina P.;
GND
105893063X
Affiliation
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Institute for Bee Protection, Germany
Pistorius, Jens;
Affiliation
Odemer Apiaries, Germany
Odemer, Franziska

The ongoing debate about glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) and their implications for beneficial arthropods gives rise to controversy. This research was carried out to cover possible sublethal GBH effects on the brood and colony development, adult survival, and overwintering success of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) under field conditions. Residues in bee relevant matrices, such as nectar, pollen, and plants, were additionally measured. To address these questions, we adopted four independent study approaches. For brood effects and survival, we orally exposed mini-hives housed in the “Kieler mating-nuc” system to sublethal concentrations of 4.8 mg glyphosate/kg (T1, low) and 137.6 mg glyphosate/kg (T2, high) over a period of one brood cycle (21 days). Brood development and colony conditions were assessed after a modified OECD method (No. 75). For adult survival, we weighed and labeled freshly emerged workers from control and exposed colonies and introduced them into non-contaminated mini-hives to monitor their life span for 25 consecutive days. The results from these experiments showed a trivial effect of GBH on colony conditions and the survival of individual workers, even though the hatching weight was reduced in T2. The brood termination rate (BTR) in the T2 treatment, however, was more than doubled (49.84%) when compared to the control (22.11%) or T1 (20.69%). This was surprising as T2 colonies gained similar weight and similar numbers of bees per colony compared to the control, indicating an equal performance. Obviously, the brood development in T2 was not “terminated” as expected by the OECD method terminology, but rather “slowed down” for an unknown period of time. In light of these findings, we suggest that chronic high GBH exposure is capable of significantly delaying worker brood development, while no further detrimental effects seem to appear at the colony level. Against this background, we discuss additional results and possible consequences of GBH for honey bee health.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Rights

License Holder: 2020 by the authors

Use and reproduction:

Export