Artikel CC BY 4.0
referiert
Veröffentlicht

Bee colony assessments with the Liebefeld method: How do individual beekeepers influence results and are photo assessments an option to reduce variability?

Zugehörigkeit
Eurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox GmbH Eutinger Strasse 24, 75223 Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany
Bargen, Holger;
Zugehörigkeit
Eurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox GmbH Eutinger Strasse 24, 75223 Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany
Fauser, Aline;
Zugehörigkeit
Eurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox GmbH Eutinger Strasse 24, 75223 Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany
Gätschenberger, Heike;
Zugehörigkeit
Eurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox GmbH Eutinger Strasse 24, 75223 Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany
Gonsior, Gundula;
Zugehörigkeit
Eurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox GmbH Eutinger Strasse 24, 75223 Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany
Knäbe, Silvio

Colony strength, food storage and brood development are a fundamental part of each honeybee field study. Colony assessments are used to compare and assess those for beehive over time. At present, most colony assessments are made by experienced beekeepers according to Liebefeld method. This method is based on an estimation of areas covered by honeybees, food and brood stages on each side of a comb. Areas are counted from a grid separating the comb side into 8 sections which are protocolled with an accuracy of 0.5 sections. An assessment for a hive takes up to 20 min and even with two field locations, it is necessary to split assessments between beekeepers. So, it is important to make estimates as comparable as possible. For this purpose, beekeepers practice the assessments on pre-determined photographs to “calibrate themselves”. The advantage of the Liebefeld assessment is that the condition of bee hive is estimated with minimum disturbance of the bees. Digital photography is under discussion to gain data with high precision and accuracy with one major disadvantage. To be able to see food and brood stages in photographs, bees have to be removed from combs. This, however, results in a disturbance of the colony – especially if the assessments take place in short time intervals of 7 ± 1 days. An experiment was performed to evaluate the variation between individual beekeepers and to compare the results to data generated with photographs. For the experiment, five colonies were assessed each by four beekeepers independently according to Liebefeld method. Each comb side of the five colonies was photographed with and without honeybees sitting on it for precise analysis at the computer for a number of bees, nectar cells, pollen cells, eggs, open brood and capped brood. The number of bees and cells with the different contents were generated by an area-based assessment in ImageJ as well as a detailed counting with help of HiveAnalyzer® Software. Data from beekeeper estimations were then compared with assessments based on digital photography. With the results of the experiment, we tried to answer several questions. With the study, we wanted to determine the level of variation between the beekeepers for the live stages and food stores estimated.

Vorschau

Zitieren

Zitierform:
Zitierform konnte nicht geladen werden.

Zugriffsstatistik

Gesamt:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:
12 Monate:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:

Rechte

Nutzung und Vervielfältigung: