Artikel Alle Rechte vorbehalten
referiert
Veröffentlicht

MAGAM II–prospective observational multicentre poisons centres study on eye exposures caused by cleaning products

Zugehörigkeit
Poisons Information Centre, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Hermanns-Clausen, Maren;
Zugehörigkeit
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
Desel, Herbert;
Zugehörigkeit
GIZ-Nord Poisons Center, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
Färber, Elke;
Zugehörigkeit
Poison Center Bonn, Children's University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
Seidel, Carola;
Zugehörigkeit
Poisons Information Centre Austria, Vienna, Austria
Holzer, Angelika;
Zugehörigkeit
Department of Clinical Toxicology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Eyer, Florian;
Zugehörigkeit
Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health Poison Information Centre, Berlin, Germany
Engel, Antje;
Zugehörigkeit
Poisons Information Centre, Erfurt, Germany
Prasa, Dagmar;
Zugehörigkeit
Poison Center of the Saarland, University Children’s Hospital, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
Tutdibi, Erol;
Zugehörigkeit
Poisons Centre–Clinical Toxicology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
Stürer, Andreas

Objective: Local effects on the eye following cleaning product exposures are frequently reported. According to EU chemicals legislation many cleaning products are labelled with Hazard Phrase 318 indicating risk of irreversible eye damage. The objectives of this study were to identify cleaning products with potential for irreversible eye damage by collecting human exposure data from poisons centres (PC), and to clarify to what degree exact product identification is possible during a PC telephone call. Methods: MAGAM II was a multicentre binational prospective observational PC study. All human eye exposures to detergents or maintenance products reported to nine PCs taking calls from the public and medical professionals during an 18-month period were included. The severity of eye effects was rated according to the WHO Poisoning Severity Score. Results: Five hundred and eighty-six cases were included. Product identification by name leading to formula information was successful in 533 cases (91%). Follow-up was successful in 528 exposures. Irrigation was performed in 94% of cases. Duration of symptoms was ≥24 hours in 73 patients (25%). 33 (6%) patients developed moderate eye injury. Healing was reported in all cases. The percentage of moderate cases was highest in the group of drain cleaners (25%), toilet cleaners (18%) and oven cleaners (15%). Products intended for professional use caused relatively more moderate eye injuries than products also intended for consumer use. Conclusion: MAGAM II has shown that PCs are able to identify formulas in sufficiently high quality as needed for product-directed toxicovigilance. The results underline the potential of PC exposure case data for product safety monitoring. The results indicate that irreversible eye damage is very rare after cleaning product exposure.

Zitieren

Zitierform:
Zitierform konnte nicht geladen werden.

Zugriffsstatistik

Gesamt:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:
12 Monate:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:

Rechte

Nutzung und Vervielfältigung:
Alle Rechte vorbehalten