Hazards of pesticides to bees : 13th International Symposium of the ICP-PR Bee Protection Group ; 18. - 20. October 2017, València (Spain) - Proceedings -

Content

• Working Groups of the ICP-PR Bee Protection Group – Developments and Progress

  p. 8

  Steeger, Thomas

• Three cardinal numbers to safeguard bees against pesticide exposure: LD₅₀ , NOEC (revised) and the Haber exponent

  p. 18

  Cresswell, James E.

• Estimating honeybee forager background mortality: a case study in the Netherlands

  p. 18

  Roessink, Ivo; van der Steen, Sjef; Belgers, Dick; Baveco, Hans; Focks, Andreas; Boesten, Jos

• New industry research and approaches that could help to improve the risk assessment on bees

  p. 25

  Miles, Mark; Alix, Anne; Becker, Roland; Ruddle, Natalie; Dinter, Axel; Oger, Laurent; Pilling, Ed; Sharples, Amanda; Weyman, Gabe

• Honey bee nectar foragers feeding themselves and the colony: a review in support of dietary exposure assessment

  p. 25

  Rodney, Sara; Purdy, John

• Distribution of residues of neonicotinoids in the hive and in bees in relation to bee health

  p. 32

  Purdy, John

• Simple modelling approaches to refine exposure for bee risk assessment based on worst case assumptions

  p. 38

  Miles, Mark; Gao, Zhenglei; Preuss, Thomas

• Pristine™ fungicide does not pose a hazard to bumble bees in lowbush blueberry production

  p. 38

  Cutler, G. Christopher; Sproule, Jason M.

• Lethal and sublethal effects of several formulations of azadirachtin on IPM Impact R&D colonies of the bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

  p. 39

  Sterk, Guido; Cuylaerts, Julie; Kolokytha, Paraskevi

• Quantifying sources of variability in neonicotinoid residue data for assessing risks to pollinators

  p. 46

  Sappington, Keith; Mroz, Ryan; Garber, Kris; Farruggia, Frank; Wagman, Michael; Blankinship, Amy; Koper, Chris

• Analysis and conclusions from USEPA’s neonicotinoid preliminary bee risk assessments

  p. 46

  Sappington, Keith; Mroz, Ryan; Garber, Kris; Blankinship, Amy; Wagman, Michael; Farruggia, Frank; Koper, Chris; Housenger, Justin

• Challenges to develop risk assessment schemes for Brazilian bees: multiple exposure routes

  p. 55

  Nocelli, Roberta C. F.; de Oliveira Cham, Karina; Malaspina, Osmar

• Selection matrix for Brazilian bee species to risk assessment of pesticides

  p. 56

  Viana-Silva, Flávia; Pires, Carmen; Torezani, Karoline; Borges, Leandro; Cham, Karina; Dias, Cristiane; Teixeira, Ivan; Tonelli, Carlos; Belchior, Ceres; Marcondes, Cayssa; Nocelli, Roberta; Malaspina, Osmar; Cione, Ana; Shiwa, Andreia; Ferraz, Andreia

• Using respiratory physiology techniques in assessments of pesticide effects on bees

  p. 61

  Karise, Reet; Raimets, Risto; Dreyersdorff, Gerit; Mänd, Marika

• Sub-lethal effects at stake: Does the acaricide Coumaphos and fungicide Folpet affect the hypopharyngeal glands size?

  p. 67

  Risse, Marion; Dainat, Benjamin; Jeker, Lukas

• Sensitivity of honey bee larvae to plant protection products and impact of EFSA bee guidance document

  p. 69

  Becker, Roland; Lückmann, Johannes; Miles, Mark; Alix, Anne; Weyman, Gabe; Pilling, Ed; Ruddle, Natalie; Dinter, Axel; Sharples, Amanda; Fritz, Stephanie; Oger, Laurent

• Comparison of control and toxic reference data between honeybee laboratory studies conducted in Germany and in Spain over the last decade

  p. 72

  Vergé, Emmanuelle; Ansaloni, Tommaso; Molitor, Anna Maria; Oberrauch, Sophia; Kling, Annette

• Linking protection goals to trigger values using compound specific properties: Chronic risks to bees

  p. 77

  Miles, Mark; Gao, Zhenglei; Preuss, Thomas

• Questionable suitability of OECD 237 protocol in risk assessment scheme?

  p. 82

  Sabo, R.; Staroň, M.; Sobeková, A.; Sabová, L.; Legáth, J.; Javorský, P.

• OECD GD 239 Honey bee larvae in vitro testing and solvents: on the job training

  p. 86

  Kimmel, Stefan; Cornement, Magdaléna

• Improving pesticide regulation by use of impact analyses: A case study for bees

  p. 86

  Mark , Miles; Alix, Anne; Becker, Roland; Coulson, Mike; Dinter, Axel; Oger, Laurent; Pilling, Ed; Sharples, Amanda; Weyman, Gabe

• Weight differences of honey bees after administration of sublethal doses of dimethoate

  p. 90

  Kling, Annette; Schmitzer, Stephan

• Detailed brood evaluation under field conditions: advantages and disadvantages

  p. 95

  Becker, Roland; Lückmann, Johannes

• Validation of the 22-day Honey Bee Larval Toxicity, Repeated (Chronic) Exposure Study Design

  p. 99

  Schmehl, Daniel; Hinarejos, Silvia; Ellis, Jamie; Clark, Stephen

• From field to food – Will pesticide contaminated pollen diet lead to a contamination of larval food?

  p. 103

  Böhme, Franziska; Bischoff, Gabriela; Wallner, Klaus

• Reference data project 2014 – 2015 for the assessment of control data

  p. 104

  Janke, Martina; Lüken, Dorothee J.; von der Ohe, Werner

• The acute and chronic Oomen feeding test – adapted methods and further options

  p. 108

  Lückmann, Johannes; Schmitzer, Stephan

• Which endpoints can reliably be assessed in semi-field and field pollinator species testing without estimating false positive or false negative? MDD’s and replicates issue

  p. 109

  Candolfi, Marco; Bargen, Holger; Bocksch, Sigrun; Klein, Olaf; Knaebe, Silvio; Szczesniak, Bronislawa

• Current status of the Oomen feeding test – modifications of the method to current needs

  p. 110

  Lückmann, Johannes; Schmitzer, Stephan

• ICP-PR Bee Brood Working Group – Variability of brood termination rates in reference to validity criteria and limited effectiveness of method improvement in honeybee semi-field studies (OECD GD 75)

  p. 111

  Szczesniak, Bronislawa; Pilling, Ed; Bocksch, Sigrun; Becker, Roland; Lückmann, Johannes

• Thiamethoxam Honey Bee Large Scale Colony Feeding Study – Design and Interpretation

  p. 116

  Ruddle, Natalie; Elston, Charlotte; Thompson, Helen; Overmyer, Jay; Feken, Max; Bocksch, Sigrun; Hill, Marcus

• The homing flight ring test: method for the assessment of sublethal doses of plant protection products on the honey bee in field conditions

  p. 117

  Fourrier, J.; Rouzes, A.; Monchanin, C.; Dubuisson, L.; Fortini, D.; Aupinel, P.; Grateau, S.; Vidau, C.; Chevallereau, C.; Henry, M.; Decourtye, A.

• Non-uniform distribution of treated sucrose solution via trophallaxis by honeybees affects homing success variability and mortality

  p. 117

  Zumbrunn, Severin; Guichard, Matthieu; Jeker, Lukas

• Set-up of tunnel trials: Importance of technical background for the outcome of a study

  p. 121

  Gonsior, Gundula; Gätschenberger, Heike; Vallon, Annette; Szczesniak, Bronislawa

• ‘Focal species’ – can this well-known concept in higher-tier risk assessments be an appropriate approach for solitary bees?

  p. 122

  Lückmann, Johannes; Faupel, Michael; Ludwigs, Jan-Dieter

• Semi-field testing of the solitary bee Osmia bicornis (L., 1758) (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) in flowering Phacelia tanacetifolia – Chances, improvements and limitations

  p. 126

  Lückmann, Johannes; Claßen, Christian; Mayer, Oliver; Jakoby, Oliver

• Bumble bee semi-field studies: choice and management of colonies to reduce variability in assessment endpoints

  p. 132

  Klein, O.; Franke, L.; Fricke, J.; Sorlí, J.; Knaebe, S.

• Bumble bee queen production in semi-field studies: assessment of endpoints and challenges

  p. 134

  Franke, L.; Klein, O.; Fricke, J.; Sorlí, J.; Knaebe, S.

• Tank mixtures of insecticides and fungicides, adjuvants, additives, fertilizers and their effects on honey bees after contact exposure in a spray chamber

  p. 137

  Wernecke, Anna; Frommberger, Malte; Alkassab, Abdulrahim T.; Eckert, Jakob H.; Wirtz, Ina Patrizia; Pistorius, Jens

• Comparative chronic toxicity of three neonicotinoids on New Zealand packaged honey bees

  p. 137

  Wood, Sarah C.; Kozii, Ivanna V.; Koziy, Roman V.; Epp, Tasha; Simko, Elemir

• Summary of an ICPPR Non-Apis workshop – Subgroup higher tier (bumble bees and solitary bees) with recommendations for a semi-field experimental design

  p. 142

  Knaebe, Silvio; Alscher, Annika; Classen, Christian; Exeler, Nina; Franke, Lea; Fricke, Julian; Frommberger, Malte; Guerola, Juan Sorlí; Hecht-Rost, Sabine; Kimmel, Stefan; Klein, Olaf; Lueckmann, Johannes; Molitor, Claire; Peters, Britta; Schneider, Christof

• An international workshop on pesticide exposure assessment for non-Apis bees

  p. 145

  Hinarejos, Silvia; Bireley, Richard; Bosch, Jordi; Boyle, Natalie; Hou, Wayne; Pitts- Singer, Theresa; Singh, Rajwinder; Steeger, Thomas; Williams, Neil

• Technical Innovations In Bumble Bee Semi-Field and Field Tests

  p. 146

  Allan, Matthew

• Including Bombus impatiens in the mix: Developing semi-field pesticide risk assessment methodology for the North American surrogate bumble bee

  p. 153

  Scott-Dupree, Cynthia; Gradish, Angela E.; Celetti, Tara; Cutler, Chris

• Oral toxicity test with solitary bees: Experiences on the acute feeding test

  p. 158

  Hodapp, Bettina; Kimmel, Stefan

• A method for a solitary bee (Osmia sp.) first tier acute contact and oral laboratory test: an update

  p. 158

  Roessink, Ivo; Hanewald, Nicole; Schneider, Christoph; Exeler, Nina; Schnurr, Alexander; Molitor, Anna- Maria; Soler, Eugenia; Kimmel, Stefan; Molitor, Claire; Smagghe, Guy; Van der Steen, Sjef

• Field exposure study: handling three different pollinator species and several matrices of residue analysis

  p. 160

  Kimmel, Stefan; Höger, Stefan

• Exposure by nesting material? – Investigation of potentially suitable methods for higher tier studies with solitary bees

  p. 164

  Jütte, Tobias; Steinigeweg, Charlotte; Pistorius, Jens

• Non-Apis (Bombus terrestris) versus honeybee (Apis mellifera) acute oral and contact sensitivity – Preliminary results of ECPA company data evaluation

  p. 170

  Dinter, Axel; Alix, Anne; Becker, Roland; Campbell, Peter; Miles, Mark; Pilling, Ed; Ruddle, Natalie; Sharples, Amanda; Weyman, Gabe; Oger, Laurent

• A review of available bumble bee colony end-points and identification of current knowledge gaps

  p. 170

  Sultan, M.; Exeler, N.; Almanza, M.T.; Cabrera, A.R.; Sterk, G.

• Impact of pesticide residue on Japanese Orchard Bees (Osmia cornifrons) development and mortality

  p. 172

  Phan, Ngoc; Rajotte, Ed; Biddinger, David

• Synergistic effects between variety of insecticides and an EBI fungicide combinations on bumble bees (Bombus terrestris L.)

  p. 176

  Raimets, Risto; Mänd, Marika; Cresswell, James E.

• Developing methods for field experiments using commercially reared bumblebee colonies – initial colony strength and experimental duration as influential factors

  p. 176

  Dietzsch, Anke C.; Frommberger, Malte; Pistorius, Jens

• Large-scale monitoring of effects of clothianidin dressed OSR seeds on pollinating insects in Northern Germany: Effects on large earth bumblebees (Bombus terrestris)

  p. 180

  Sterk, Guido; Peters, Britta; Gao, Zhenglei; Zumkier, Ulrich

• 27 Year polderen about bees and pesticides in the Netherlands; working group Pollinating insects, pesticides and biocides

  p. 180

  van der Steen, J.J.M.

• Honey bee poisoning incidents in Germany

  p. 181

  Pistorius, Jens; Thorbahn, David; Bischoff, Gabriela

• The U.S. National Strategy to Promote the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators and the Role of MP3s

  p. 183

  Steeger, Thomas

• Pesticide and metabolites residues in honeybees: A 2014-2017 Greek compendium

  p. 186

  Kasiotis, Konstantinos M.; Machera, Kyriaki

• Residues in bee-relevant matrices

  p. 189

  Trodtfeld, Peter; Friessleben, Reinhard; Maus, Christian

• Neonicotinoids & Pollinators: Indian Perspective

  p. 193

  Thakur, Raj; Kumaranag, K.; Manzoor, Uzma; Chakrabarthy, P.

• Results of a monitoring program of pesticide residues in beebread in Spain. Using toxic unit approach to identify scenarios of risk for management programs

  p. 194

  Elena Alonso Prados; Hernández, Raquel Martín; Pascual, Mariano Higes

• Residues of plant protection products in honey – pilot study for a method to define maximum residue levels in honey (MRLs)

  p. 194

  Hecht-Rost, Sabine; Alscher, Annika; Oswald, Gaby; Sagner, Anne; Wallner, Klaus

• How do regulatory requirements and assumptions correlate to practical experience in residue studies with nectar and pollen?

  p. 196

  Knaebe, Silvio; Mack, Pierre; Appeltauer, Andreas; Kling, Annette

• A research about different residues in pollen and honey samples

  p. 198

  Lüken, Dorothee J.; von der Ohe, Werner