Artikel CC BY-NC 4.0
referiert
Veröffentlicht

Cost distribution of bluetongue surveillance and vaccination programmes in Austria and Switzerland (2007-2016).

Zugehörigkeit
Institute for Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Pinior, Beate;
ORCID
0000-0002-4919-7786
Zugehörigkeit
Institute for Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Firth, Clair L.;
Zugehörigkeit
Institute for Veterinary Disease Control Mödling, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Mödling, Austria.
Loitsch, Angelika;
Zugehörigkeit
Federal Ministry of Health, Vienna, Austria.
Stockreiter, Simon;
Zugehörigkeit
Institute for Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hutter, Sabine;
Zugehörigkeit
Institute for Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Richter, Veronika;
Zugehörigkeit
Department of Biological Safety, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Lebl, Karin;
Zugehörigkeit
Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office, Bern, Switzerland.
Schwermer, Heinzpeter;
Zugehörigkeit
Institute for Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Käsbohrer, Annemarie

Bluetongue virus (BTV) is an emerging transboundary disease in Europe, which can cause significant production losses among ruminants. The analysis presented here assessed the costs of BTV surveillance and vaccination programmes in Austria and Switzerland between 2007 and 2016. Costs were compared with respect to time, type of programme, geographical area and who was responsible for payment. The total costs of the BTV vaccination and surveillance programmes in Austria amounted to €23.6 million, whereas total costs in Switzerland were €18.3 million. Our analysis demonstrates that the costs differed between years and geographical areas, both within and between the two countries. Average surveillance costs per animal amounted to approximately €3.20 in Austria compared with €1.30 in Switzerland, whereas the average vaccination costs per animal were €6.20 in Austria and €7.40 in Switzerland. The comparability of the surveillance costs is somewhat limited, however, due to differences in each nation's surveillance (and sampling) strategy. Given the importance of the export market for cattle production, investments in such programmes are more justified for Austria than for Switzerland. The aim of the retrospective assessment presented here is to assist veterinary authorities in planning and implementing cost-effective and efficient control strategies for emerging livestock diseases.

Zitieren

Zitierform:
Zitierform konnte nicht geladen werden.

Zugriffsstatistik

Gesamt:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:
12 Monate:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:

Rechte

Nutzung und Vervielfältigung: