Evaluating the precision of eight spatial sampling schemes in estimating regional means of simulated yield for two crops

Zhao, Gang; Hoffmann, Holger; Yeluripati, Jagadeesh B.; Specka, Xenia GND; Nendel, Claas GND; Coucheney, Elsa; Kuhnert, Matthias; Tao, Fulu; Constantin, Julie; Raynal, Helene; Teixeira, Edmar; Grosz, Balazs Peter GND; Doro, Luca; Kiese, Ralf GND; Eckersteen, Henrik; Haas, Edwin GND; Cammarano, Davide; Kassie, Belay T.; Moriondo, Marco; Trombi, Giacomo; et al.

We compared the precision of simple random sampling (SimRS) and seven types of stratified random sampling (StrRS) schemes in estimating regional mean of water-limited yields for two crops (winter wheat and silage maize) that were simulated by fourteen crop models.We found that the precision gains of StrRS varied considerably across stratification methods and crop models. Precision gains for compact geographical stratification were positive, stable and consistent across crop models. Stratification with soil water holding capacity had very high precision gains for twelve models, but resulted in negative gains for two models. Increasing the sample size monotonously decreased the sampling errors for all the sampling schemes. We conclude that compact geographical stratification can modestly but consistently improve the precision in estimating regional mean yields. Using the most influential environmental variable for stratification can notably improve the sampling precision, especially when the sensitivity behavior of a crop model is known.

Dateien

Zitieren

Zitierform:

Zhao, Gang / Hoffmann, Holger / Yeluripati, Jagadeesh / et al: Evaluating the precision of eight spatial sampling schemes in estimating regional means of simulated yield for two crops. 2016.

Rechte

Nutzung und Vervielfältigung:
Alle Rechte vorbehalten

Export