ICPBR-Working Group Risks posed by dusts: overview of the area and recommendations

Zugehörigkeit
Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL), Messeweg 11/12, 38104 Braunschweig
Forster, Rolf;
Zugehörigkeit
Testapi, 464 Sarré, 49350 Gennes, France
Giffard, Hervé;
GND
1058930338
Zugehörigkeit
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland, Brunswick, Germany
Heimbach, Udo;
Zugehörigkeit
Syngenta Agro France, 1 avenue des prés CS 10537, 78286 Guyancourt Cedex, France
Laporte, Jean-Michel;
Zugehörigkeit
RIFCon, Im Neuenheimer Feld 517, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Lückmann, Johannes;
Zugehörigkeit
Bayer CropScience AG, Development - Environmental Safety -Ecotoxicology, Alfred-Nobel-Str. 50, 40789 Monheim am Rhein, Germany
Nikolakis, Alexander;
GND
105893063X
Zugehörigkeit
Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland, Brunswick, Germany
Pistorius, Jens;
Zugehörigkeit
Anses, DPR, 253 avenue du Général Leclerc, 94701 Maisons-Alfort, France
Vergnet, Christine

Background: In 2008 the poisoning of about 12000 bee colonies was reported from Germany. These poisonings were caused by the drift of dust particles containing the insecticidal substance clothianidin following the seeding of maize seeds, inadequately treated with the insecticide Poncho Pro. Results: Investigations were done on the dust load contained in seed packages of different crops, on the experimental abrasion of dust from treated seeds using the Heubach-Dustmeter as well as on the actual dust drift during the sowing operation of treated seeds with different machinery under field conditions. Resistance to abrasion of treated seeds and subsequent dust drift during sowing operations differ significantly between crops, coating recipes and facilities. Furthermore dust drift depends on particle size, sowing technology as well as on environmental conditions (e.g. wind speed, soil humidity). Conclusions: The drift of dust from treated seeds may pose a risk to honeybees, which needs to be appropriately considered within the authorization process of pesticides. The total quantity of abraded dust as well as the actual emission of dust during the sowing operation can be significantly reduced by technical means (e.g. coating recipe and facility equipment, deflector technology) and by additional mitigation measures (e.g. maximum wind speed).

Zitieren

Zitierform:
Zitierform konnte nicht geladen werden.

Zugriffsstatistik

Gesamt:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:
12 Monate:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:

Rechte

Nutzung und Vervielfältigung:
Alle Rechte vorbehalten